TeleMed Today
State Laws · Professional Requirements

Cross-state licensing, compact by compact

Interstate compacts are the main route a clinician takes to treat patients in another state. This tracks which jurisdictions belong to which compact — with the effective date and enacting bill for each, read off the compacts’ own commissions.

By TeleMed Today Editorial TeamUpdated 2026-09-012 of 5 compacts verified

Care is regulated where the patient sits. A clinician in Denver treating someone in Trenton is practicing medicine in New Jersey, and needs authority there — which is why the licensure question is the first gate on any interstate telehealth program, and the one most often assumed away.

Compacts are how that gate opens, but they do not all work the same way, and the difference matters more than the membership map. The physician compact is an expedited licensing pathway: it speeds up getting a full license in each state, and you still hold one license per state at the end. The nursing, psychology, physical therapy, and counseling compacts grant a privilege to practice — one home-state license carries authority into every other member state. A physician and a nurse practising across the same two states are in structurally different regulatory positions.

Membership also is not a proxy for how easy a state is to work in. Connecticut is a full compact member and still bars telehealth prescribing of most controlled substances. Florida runs an open registration pathway and mandates no payment parity at all. Read the licensure answer here, then read the state.

Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

Physicians

Source: IMLC Commission — Participating States · checked 2026-08-31

Member
39
Member (limited)
2
Enacted, not live
4
Introduced
2
Not a member
4

51 jurisdictions

Interstate Medical Licensure Compact status by jurisdiction
JurisdictionStatusEffectiveEnacting bill
AlabamaMember05/19/2015SB 125
AlaskaEnacted, not live

Enacted; implementation delayed.

02/23/2026HB 352
ArizonaMember05/11/2016HB 2502
ArkansasEnacted, not live

Enacted; implementation delayed.

03/12/2025
CaliforniaNot a member
ColoradoMember06/08/2016HB 1047
ConnecticutMember03/15/2026GNVR Bill 5046
DelawareMember06/23/2021HB 160
District of ColumbiaMember06/12/2023B 177
FloridaMember12/20/2024CS/SB 7016
GeorgiaMember09/16/2021SB 16
HawaiiMember (limited)

Issues licenses only — cannot serve as State of Principal License.

01/01/2025SB 674
IdahoMember03/25/2015HB 150
IllinoisMember07/21/2015HR 3680
IndianaMember05/01/2023SB 251
IowaMember07/02/2015SB 273
KansasMember05/13/2016HB 2456
KentuckyMember12/13/2018SB 182
LouisianaMember07/01/2021SB 27
MaineMember04/06/2017LD 1359
MarylandMember01/19/2018SB 234
MassachusettsIntroduced01/15/2025HD.3377
MichiganMember06/01/2019HB 4066
MinnesotaMember05/19/2015SF 253
MississippiMember05/17/2016HB 41
MissouriMember10/28/2024SB 670
MontanaMember04/08/2015HB 429
NebraskaMember01/05/2017LB 88
NevadaMember05/27/2015SB 251
New HampshireMember05/05/2016HB 1665
New JerseyMember02/05/2024S 523
New MexicoEnacted, not live

Enacted; implementation in process.

01/22/2026SB 67
New YorkIntroduced03/04/2026
North CarolinaMember01/01/2026
North DakotaMember01/15/2019SB 2173
OhioMember07/01/2021SB 6
OklahomaMember01/18/2019HB 2351
OregonNot a member
PennsylvaniaMember07/07/2025HB 1619
Rhode IslandEnacted, not live

Enacted; implementation delayed.

06/29/2022S 2606
South CarolinaNot a member
South DakotaMember03/12/2015SB 63
TennesseeMember02/09/2017HB 664
TexasMember06/07/2022HB 1616
UtahMember03/20/2015HB 121
VermontMember (limited)

Issues licenses only — cannot serve as State of Principal License.

12/21/2017S 253
VirginiaNot a member

Bills to join have been introduced but have not passed.

HB 527
WashingtonMember01/17/2017SB 5221
West VirginiaMember03/31/2015HB 2496
WisconsinMember12/14/2015AB 253
WyomingMember02/27/2015HB 107

How to read the physician compact

Of the 51 jurisdictions, 39 are full IMLC members issuing Letters of Qualification and licenses. 2 Hawaii and Vermont — issue licenses through the compact but cannot serve as a State of Principal License, so neither can be used as a home state to enter it. 4 have enacted the compact with implementation still in process or delayed, which is the category most likely to be reported wrongly elsewhere: the law exists, the pathway does not yet work.

4 jurisdictions are not members and have no active legislation, and 2 have bills introduced but not enacted. California is the consequential one — the largest physician population in the country sits entirely outside the compact, and nothing in the current session changes that.

Dates are the compact’s own effective dates, not the date a bill was signed. Where the two differ, the effective date is what determines whether you can actually use the pathway today.

What is not here yet

NLC, PSYPACT, Counseling Compact are scaffolded but not published. Each publishes per-state status in a form that cannot be read reliably at scale — an interactive map, a linked PDF, or an embedded infographic — and we do not publish compact status until every jurisdiction has been read off the commission itself.

  • NLC NCSBN publishes per-state implementation status only inside an interactive map and a linked PDF. Not yet transcribed against the primary source. Source
  • PSYPACT PSYPACT publishes its state map as an embedded infographic image with no machine-readable status data. Requires manual transcription before publication. Source
  • Counseling Compact Privilege-to-practice issuance began in phases; per-state status not yet verified against the commission. Source

Common questions

Does a licensure compact let me practice in another state without a license?
No, and this is the most common misunderstanding. The physician compact (IMLC) is an expedited pathway to obtaining a full license in another state — you still end up licensed in each state where your patients are located. The nursing, psychology, PT, and counseling compacts work differently: they grant a privilege to practice across member states from a single home-state license. Compacts change how you get authority, not whether you need it.
Which state's law applies during a telehealth visit?
Almost always the law of the state where the patient is physically located at the time of the encounter, not where the clinician sits. That is why cross-state licensing matters at all: a clinician in one state treating a patient in another is practicing in the patient's state and needs authority there.
What is a State of Principal License, and why do Hawaii and Vermont differ?
Under the IMLC, your State of Principal License (SPL) is the home state that verifies your credentials and issues the Letter of Qualification used to obtain licenses elsewhere. Hawaii and Vermont are IMLC member states that issue licenses through the compact but cannot serve as an SPL — so a physician cannot enter the compact using a Hawaii or Vermont license as their home base.
Which large states are outside the physician compact?
California, Oregon, South Carolina, and Virginia are not IMLC members. New York and Massachusetts have had legislation introduced but not enacted. Physicians treating patients in those states need a full license obtained through the state's ordinary process.
Does compact membership mean the state is telehealth-friendly overall?
No. Compact membership only addresses how a clinician obtains licensure. A state can be an easy state to get licensed in and still impose strict rules on prescribing, consent, modality, or payment. Connecticut, for example, is a full IMLC member with some of the tightest controlled-substance telehealth limits in the country.

Sources

Compact membership changes as legislatures act and commissions bring states live. Verify current status with the relevant compact and the state licensing board before relying on it for a licensing decision. This page is educational and is not legal advice.